AI in UX research: A superpower, not a substitute

If you're in a digital world, there’s no escaping AI.

And if you're a UX researcher, maybe you've already asked yourself: "Is AI going to take my job?"  

Short answer? No, it won’t. But it will change how you do your job. 

One of the key questions is: "How can I use AI to work smarter, not harder?" Like with any tool, it all depends on how we use it.

Here we won’t repeat the usual “AI isn’t magic” message. Instead of theory, we’ll focus on real-life situations where AI can improve UX research, and where it still needs to step aside for human intervention. Plus, we’ll look at what the future of our field might look like.

Because AI might know how, but it doesn’t know why.

UX research is more than data: “AI can’t see the bag in your hand”

UX research has never been just about collecting data. It’s about understanding people. It’s about watching their facial expressions when they get stuck during onboarding. It’s about hearing their frustration when they hit "Back" ten times because they’re lost. It’s about catching what users don’t say, but feel.

AI can process millions of data points. It can spot patterns. It can suggest hypotheses. But it doesn’t understand the emotional context, cultural nuance, or everyday realities that shape user behavior.

Why does someone click the wrong button? Maybe the icon is unclear. Or maybe they’re using your product at a busy tram stop, stressed out, using one hand. AI doesn’t know they’re right-handed but typing with their left hand because they’re holding a coffee and a bag. That’s the context AI (still) can’t see - and that’s where UX researchers shine. We read between the lines and uncover the hidden why.

Let’s consolidate this point clearly: AI excels at the what, but struggles with the why. It detects frustration, but not the reason behind it. It can cluster survey responses, but not catch the hesitation in a user’s voice when answering. That human depth—that's our domain.

A quick history: how UX tools have changed

UX research has come a long way, from scribbling notes on paper to using Excel to tools like Hotjar and Lookback. AI is simply the next step in that evolution. Every new tech tool changed how we work, but not why we work.

As this evolution continues, it’s worth asking: where are we now, and what does AI bring to the table today?

Adding AI isn’t some big break - it’s a natural step in the digital shift. Just like digital prototypes replaced paper sketches, AI will replace the tedious grunt work of sifting through massive amounts of data.

Yet, the heart of UX - human intuition, empathy, and contextual understanding remains irreplaceable. Every tool helped us get insights faster, but none could tell us what those insights mean for real people. That’s still on us.

What can AI actually do for UX research today?

It won’t replace us, but it can speed us up and lighten the load. Here’s how:

• Analyzing tons of data: Tools like ChatGPT, Claude, or Perplexity help summarize interviews, sort answers, and pull out topics.
  
• Drafting research plans: AI can generate first drafts of interview guides, questions, or usability test scenarios for you to tweak.
  
• Transcripts and summaries: Tools like Otter or Transkript automatically create transcripts and even generate highlights and summaries.
  
• Persona generation: AI can draft persona outlines based on user data, which the researcher then refines and validates.
  
• Prototype testing predictions: Some tools simulate user behavior, predicting where users might click or get stuck. This is not a replacement for real users but a helpful extra layer.
  
• Heatmaps and clickstream analysis: AI can flag weird user behavior on a page, like a sudden spike in bounce rate during checkout.
  
• Clustering open responses: AI groups open-ended answers into themes, so there is no need for manual sorting.
  
• Spotting contradictions: AI can detect conflicting statements in interviews, which is super helpful for catching hidden blockers.
  
• Recommending next steps: Based on insights, AI can suggest possible actions, but the final call is still up to humans.
  
• Finding anomalies in time-series data: Over long periods, AI spots behavior shifts we might miss.
  
  

All of this helps us focus on what really matters—interpretation, strategy, and decisions. We spend less time tagging answers and more time talking to users and digging deeper.

AI’s limits in UX: where machines stop and people start

AI sees frustration, but doesn’t know what caused it. It doesn’t know if someone’s stressed because they lost their job or because your design is confusing. It can’t sit across from a user, look them in the eyes, and feel the “aha!” moment. It doesn’t know how someone’s priorities change based on their life.

Great researchers aren’t defined by tools, but by curiosity, empathy, and the ability to connect dots others don’t even see. They know that context is everything. And knows how to read between the lines. AI can do the heavy lifting - finding keywords, grouping answers, and suggesting patterns. But we give those patterns meaning. You can’t automate that.

We ask:
"Why does this matter to the user?"
"How does it affect their experience?"

Without context, it’s easy to make a conclusion that sounds right but isn’t. That’s why human interpretation is crucial - ensuring the answer isn’t just fast, but true.

AI can also amplify bad research

Just like AI can boost a good UX process, it can also boost a bad one. Wrong input = wrong output. Garbage in, garbage out.

There’s a real risk of taking AI-generated insights at face value, out of context, or relying too much on numbers and forgetting what they don’t show. What’s worse, some AI insights might sound smart and convincing, but actually be wrong.

That happens when we don’t validate conclusions, or use AI as a crutch because we didn’t have time for proper research.

Without real users, UX research turns into guesswork — designing for hypothetical personas rather than actual people. That’s a recipe for failure.

In such cases, AI doesn’t fix the process, it just speeds up the wrong conclusions.

AI is everywhere, but UX stays human

AI already helps us today in several ways. It sorts, groups, transcribes, labels, and even offers recommendations. And let's be honest, it's pretty good at it. 

But what remains ours is the most important thing: understanding people. Not their clicks, but the reasons behind their clicks. Not just what they said, but what they actually thought. Everything AI speeds up, we have to slow down to be accurate. 

So instead of wondering if it will replace us, give this a try: Pick one AI tool this week and test it on a current project. Track how much time you saved. Then ask: what did that free me up to notice or understand better?

Use AI for busywork. Save yourself for the story.

Hey, you! What do you think?

They say knowledge has power only if you pass it on - we hope our blog post gave you valuable insight.

If you want to share your opinion, feel free to contact us. 

We'd love to hear what you have to say!